Twitter Might Merge Twitter Blue and Verification, and Thus Charge for Being Verified

The Verge’s Alex Heath had the scoop over the weekend:

The directive is to change Twitter Blue, the company’s optional,
$4.99 a month subscription that unlocks additional features
,
into a more expensive subscription that also verifies users,
according to people familiar with the matter and internal
correspondence seen by The Verge. Twitter is currently planning to
charge $19.99 for the new Twitter Blue subscription. Under the
current plan, verified users would have 90 days to subscribe or
lose their blue checkmark. Employees working on the project were
told on Sunday that they need to meet a deadline of November 7th
to launch the feature or they will be fired.

I can verify that a team has been tasked with this, but I heard the deadline was this Friday (November 4), not Monday (the 7th). But my real quibble is reporting anything going on at Twitter right now as a definitive plan. It’s a fact that Musk tasked a team at Twitter with building this and gave them “a week” to build it; it’s not a fact that it’s ever going to see the light of day.

As for the idea of charging verified users to remain verified (or, perhaps better put, requiring verified users to sign up for Twitter Blue), it strikes me as an idea that’s contrary to the reason verification exists. Nate Silver:

I’m probably the perfect target for this, use Twitter a ton, can
afford $20/mo, not particularly anti-Elon, but my reaction is that
I’ve generated a ton of valuable free content for Twitter over the
years and they can go fuck themselves.

Stephen King:

$20 a month to keep my blue check? Fuck that, they should pay me.
If that gets instituted, I’m gone like Enron.

There’s a weirdly but unsurprisingly deeply insecure faction on the right that considers verified Twitter users to be one of their many enemy factions. They call them “bluechecks”. And while I’m sure there are some verified Twitter users who really do see it as some sort of prestige status thing, as Silver and King point out, in practical terms it’s for Twitter’s benefit, not for the verified users. It’s Twitter that benefits from millions of users being able to feel certain that the “Stephen King” with 7 million followers on Twitter is really the Stephen King. It’s Twitter that benefits from Nate Silver engaging with users and tweeting analysis. Popular tweeters aren’t getting paid to tweet. And now Elon Musk thinks they should pay to tweet?

Count me as skeptical that this is going to happen as currently discussed.

Read Original post from Daring Fireball

Scroll to Top
[class^="wpforms-"]
[class^="wpforms-"]
Skip to content